bballjer44 |
10 Aug 2018 03:46 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by SiteWolf
(Post 95789)
yeah, sometimes it's hard to decide what the 'fair' answer is....I used to exclusively score those as a tie, but a few months ago discussion here caused me to sometimes score a little differently..........the problem is, I don't always know WHY someone doesn't play when scheduled...in other words whether 'pickers' should know when they pick what's up
but you're probably right....in most cases if one choice doesn't play, it should probably be scored a tie
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by vansmak
(Post 95792)
Tommy millone did not pitch yesterday so obviously he had less earned runs than Sean Newcomb. Just sayin....
|
I have always advocated to use pure numbers (i.e. zeroes if he didn't play). That is the only thing that is black and white.
With no published scoring rules how does everyone know? Scheduled to play sometimes changes during the day or varies by source so you CAN'T use that.
Since the last discussion I changed to picking the opponent of not scheduled to pitch because you indicated not playing means can't win.
I still disagree with that (since he can't lose either) but accept it.
Whatever you do is fine. But please no exceptions. Please explain again.
Maybe make a sticky topic for a while with how you score a non-player.
|