|
||
|
Current Events A place for serious discussion of news and events from the world around us. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Talk about delusional
He's nothing if not persistent
I wonder if it's a case of being truly delusional or if it's a matter of if you say it enough it will eventually be true. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
We're all so used to the lies by now, this really isn't surprising to anyone. Amazing how ~30% of voters still somehow believe these jackasses are doing a "heckuva job".
Hussein's Prewar Ties To Al-Qaeda Discounted Pentagon Report Says Contacts Were Limited By R. Jeffrey Smith Washington Post Staff Writer Friday, April 6, 2007; Page A01 Captured Iraqi documents and intelligence interrogations of Saddam Hussein and two former aides "all confirmed" that Hussein's regime was not directly cooperating with al-Qaeda before the U.S. invasion of Iraq, according to a declassified Defense Department report released yesterday. The declassified version of the report, by acting Inspector General Thomas F. Gimble, also contains new details about the intelligence community's prewar consensus that the Iraqi government and al-Qaeda figures had only limited contacts, and about its judgments that reports of deeper links were based on dubious or unconfirmed information. The report had been released in summary form in February. The report's release came on the same day that Vice President Cheney, appearing on Rush Limbaugh's radio program, repeated his allegation that al-Qaeda was operating inside Iraq "before we ever launched" the war, under the direction of Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, the terrorist killed last June. "This is al-Qaeda operating in Iraq," Cheney told Limbaugh's listeners about Zarqawi, who he said had "led the charge for Iraq." Cheney cited the alleged history to illustrate his argument that withdrawing U.S. forces from Iraq would "play right into the hands of al-Qaeda." ... ... Instead, the report said, the CIA had concluded in June 2002 that there were few substantiated contacts between al-Qaeda operatives and Iraqi officials and had said that it lacked evidence of a long-term relationship like the ones Iraq had forged with other terrorist groups. "Overall, the reporting provides no conclusive signs of cooperation on specific terrorist operations," that CIA report said, adding that discussions on the issue were "necessarily speculative." The CIA had separately concluded that reports of Iraqi training on weapons of mass destruction were "episodic, sketchy, or not corroborated in other channels," the inspector general's report said. It quoted an August 2002 CIA report describing the relationship as more closely resembling "two organizations trying to feel out or exploit each other" rather than cooperating operationally. The CIA was not alone, the defense report emphasized. The Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) had concluded that year that "available reporting is not firm enough to demonstrate an ongoing relationship" between the Iraqi regime and al-Qaeda, it said.
__________________
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
bump
__________________
Just some thoughts Did BO bring change we can believe in or is he trying to change what we believe in? Things which seemed reasonable were often untrue..Other things were partly true and partly untrue..A few things were really true. - Wilbur Wright |